Former Phoenix Officer Sues City Over Fatal Shooting Firing

News Summary

A former Phoenix police officer, Jesse Johnson, has filed a lawsuit against the city and former interim Chief Michael Sullivan following his termination linked to a fatal shooting incident in 2022. Johnson claims wrongful termination after he shot and killed Ali Osman during a confrontation, asserting he faced unequal treatment compared to his colleague who received a lesser punishment. The lawsuit seeks damages and aims to challenge the vague ‘Sanctity of Life’ policy that influenced his firing. This case could have significant financial implications for the city, which had recently settled a lawsuit with Osman’s family for $5 million.

Former Phoenix Police Officer Files Lawsuit Over Termination Linked to Fatal Shooting

In a dramatic turn of events in Phoenix, a former police officer is taking legal action against the city following a fatal shooting incident that occurred in 2022. Jesse Johnson, who found himself at the center of a controversial and tragic event, is now suing the City of Phoenix and former interim police chief Michael Sullivan for what he claims is wrongful termination.

The Incident that Shook the City

The incident in question took place on September 24, 2022, when 34-year-old Ali Osman was fatally shot by Johnson during a confrontation. Osman allegedly began throwing rocks at cars in the vicinity, specifically near 19th and Glendale avenues, and later turned his attention to the officers who responded to the scene.

Things escalated quickly when one of the rocks thrown by Osman pierced the hood of a police SUV and another shattered a spotlight on the vehicle. In what Johnson describes as a tense moment, he and another officer made the fateful decision to open fire, resulting in the tragic death of Osman due to a gunshot wound to the neck.

No Criminal Charges Filed

Following the shooting, questions arose regarding the officers’ actions. However, Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell decided not to pursue any criminal charges against Johnson or his colleague. An internal review by the department’s Critical Incident Review Board examined the use of force during this incident and concluded that Johnson’s actions were in accordance with department policy.

Turning Point for Johnson

The narrative took a sharp turn in April 2024, when Interim Chief Michael Sullivan sent an email indicating that Johnson’s handling of the shooting incident was deemed out of policy. This conclusion set the stage for Johnson’s termination, which he argues was based on four alleged violations of city personnel rules, including a significant breach of the “Sanctity of Life” policy, which highlights the importance of valuing human life.

Claims of Unequal Treatment

In his federal lawsuit, Johnson argues that he has been treated unfairly compared to his colleague involved in the incident. While Johnson faced termination, his fellow officer received only a 24-hour suspension for firing at Osman. This disparity in disciplinary actions has raised eyebrows and contributed to Johnson’s claims of wrongful termination.

The Legal Battle Ahead

Johnson’s lawsuit is seeking not only monetary damages but also a court order aimed at preventing any future constitutional violations stemming from the policies in question. He asserts that the vague wording of the “Sanctity of Life” policy played a significant role in his termination, as this policy had not been previously used to discipline any officers.

Recent Departures and City Response

Interestingly, on the same day Johnson filed his lawsuit, Interim Chief Sullivan announced he would be leaving the department. While this situation unfolds, the City of Phoenix has chosen not to comment on the ongoing litigation, keeping their cards close to the chest.

Financial Implications and Previous Settlements

The situation could have serious financial implications for the city. Just previously, the city settled a lawsuit with Osman’s family for a whopping $5 million, and Johnson’s lawsuit may open the door for even more monetary liability, depending on how the legal proceedings play out.

Focus on Accountability

Sullivan, prior to his departure, emphasized the importance of accountability within the police department and defended their changes to the use-of-force policies. As this case develops, the eyes of the community will be closely watching to see how it affects not just the individuals involved but also the broader implications for policing practices in Phoenix.

Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic

HERE Resources

Arizona Governor Vetoes Controversial Immigration Bill
Phoenix City Council’s Impact Fee Increase and Home Prices
Arizona Supreme Court Upholds Suspension of Former Prosecutor
Arizona Attorney General Secures Victory Against Workplace Discrimination
Arizona Faces $50 Million Loss in Federal Funds

Additional Resources

• 12 News: Former Phoenix PD Officer Lawsuit
• ABC15: Lawsuit Against Phoenix Officer
• AZ Central: Mom Suing Police Over Son’s Death
• Google Search: Phoenix Police Accountability
• Wikipedia: Police Accountability